From CAD to Cast Metal in Days, Not Months — Zero Tooling Investment | ITAR Registered | Made in USA | Capability Statement

This source index links technical and program statements on Rapid Precision Castings to patents, government-supported project records, and peer-reviewed research. Project records document participants, objectives, budgets, schedules, and intended deliverables; they do not by themselves establish that every target was achieved.

LAMP™ ceramic 3D printing and investment casting

SLE™ additive manufacturing and repair

Use and limitations

These sources support the specific technology, research, or program statements described above. Customer relationships, contract completion, production delivery, cost savings, lead times, and qualification status require separate claim-specific documentation. A proposal, project objective, or target is identified as such and should not be read as a completed result.

Evidence map

What each primary source verifies

Use the source that matches the claim being evaluated. Patents describe claimed systems and methods. Government project records document participants, objectives, funding, schedules, and intended deliverables. Peer-reviewed papers document the tested materials, methods, and reported research results.

Claim or topic Primary source What the source verifies What it does not verify by itself
LAMP-related ceramic photopolymerization and investment-casting applications U.S. Patent 9,403,322 The disclosed systems, methods, inventorship, and described ceramic and investment-casting applications Commercial delivery, customer acceptance, current production timing, or completed qualification
Maturation of printed ceramic shells with the 76th CMXG and Air Force Sustainment Center America Makes / AFRL project 5554.004 Named participants, project scope, objectives, budget, schedule, and intended qualification work Completion of every objective, production delivery, or approval for an unrelated part or program
Rapid investment casting with ceramic 3D-printed shell molds America Makes / AFRL project 5577.005 Participants, technical approach, deliverables, funding, schedule, and the stated processing-time target That the target was achieved for every geometry, alloy, inspection plan, or customer schedule
SLE deposition and repair of MAR-M247 Basak and Das, Journal of Alloys and Compounds (2017) The tested MAR-M247 material system, deposition method, reported microstructure, and measured research results Automatic repair approval, service life, or applicability to every blade geometry and damage condition
SLE processing of CMSX-4 Basak, Acharya and Das (2016) The modeled and tested CMSX-4 process-development work and reported parameter findings Production qualification, component release, or interchangeability with another alloy or process specification
Epitaxial deposition of René 142 on René N5 Basak and Das, Additive Manufacturing (2018) The tested substrate and deposit materials, research method, and reported epitaxial-deposition results Approval for a specific turbine component, customer program, or field-return condition